Monday, February 16, 2009
Judaism Response Paper #1
A word can have several denotations and even more connotations depending on the way and the context within which it is used. Likewise, a comprehensive definition of Judaism has multiple facets, and to examine only one would be to deny the truth and existence of the others. One of the most popular definitions is that of Judaism as a religion, but even within that aspect of Judaism there are many branches with different beliefs. The different branches of belief vary in some practices and at times contradict or even fail to recognize other branches as Judaism. Solely defining Judaism as a religion is not viable as there are those who do not practice the religion or even believe that still identify themselves as Jewish. This indicates the possibility of a definition that corresponds to a cultural link and heritage. Using the nation to define Judaism is also unviable as it excludes populations world wide. It might be possible to define Judaism as a people, but only if that definition allows for members with almost completely disparate views, looks and lifestyles. “Race” is not feasible term for it, as race itself is entirely a social construct with its own varying connotations. It almost seems easier to define Judaism by what it is not, but that leaves just as many gaps and discrepancies. One of the most unifying themes out of these contrasting views of who is Jewish or what is Judaism is the sense of the history of the term. Judaism might have once been easier to define in a world that was smaller, but the term has changed over time as have the people who use it. Its history is one of the most important aspects of the religion, and the same might be true for those who apply the term to themselves as by doing so they are accepting at least some of the connotations conjured by the word. The most appropriate definition of Judaism would then be the facet out of the many that is most relevant to the context within which it is used. In this sense, perhaps Judaism could be best defined as an idea with historical connotations or as construct relative to the people claiming the title.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I like your thought that Judaism is an idea defined by the history of the people and religion. I think that the history of Judaism is an important factor in how we define it since it is a very old religion that has changed over the course of history.
ReplyDeleteKayla,
ReplyDeleteI found your point that it is easier to define Judaism was what it is not rather than what it is, very interesting because I discovered that too when I was writing. I also like your argument that history has has a great impact on Judaism and that it changes not between a culture, a nation, or a religion but depends more on the people themselves. Hahaha...construct!